Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen1.5-14B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

32.7

Rank #253 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 21.4.
  • Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.832.7
Released2026-08-132024-02-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Coding14971138
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen1.5-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14941113
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Math15071125
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Expert15081094
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
MMLU—68.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen1.5-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Non-English14841095
LMArena Chinese15481147
LMArena French15051116
LMArena German14981043
LMArena Japanese15121019
LMArena Russian15161046
LMArena Spanish15031085
LMArena Korean1483—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14831102

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Longer Query14921113

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Text14861128
LMArena Creative Writing14901091
LMArena Multi-Turn14891110
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen1.5-14B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper