Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen-VL Max

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen-VL Max Alibaba (Qwen)

35.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-VL Max in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 37.3 to 32.3.
  • Qwen-VL Max is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.835.9
Released2026-08-132024-01-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$3.20
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1497—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen-VL Max: 32.3 (#101)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
LMArena Vision13161213
Video-MME—51.3%
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
SpatialViz-Bench—32%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen-VL Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen-VL Max
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen-VL Max?

Gemini 3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#14); Qwen-VL Max does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen-VL Max?

Qwen-VL Max is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen-VL Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-VL Max has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper