Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

37.9

Rank #191 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 25.2.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index59.837.9
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding14971291
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14941272
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math15071305
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert15081295
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14841209
LMArena Chinese15481242
LMArena French15051260
LMArena German14981262
LMArena Russian15161193
LMArena Spanish15031289
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14831247

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14921272

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text14861272
LMArena Creative Writing14901226
LMArena Multi-Turn14891252
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper