Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Llama 3.2 90B

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 69.6 to 11.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 97.2% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index59.827.5
Released2026-08-132024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked449

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1497—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
BALROG—27.3%
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27125.5
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1494—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%2.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—
MATH Level 5—39.4%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond94.8%41%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision13161000
GeoBench—52%
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1484—
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1492—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1486—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1489—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Llama 3.2 90B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper