Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 28.9.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index59.843.1
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked449

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding14971418
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14941416
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1507—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision13161180
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English14841382
LMArena Chinese1548—
LMArena French1505—
LMArena German1498—
LMArena Japanese1512—
LMArena Korean1483—
LMArena Russian1516—
LMArena Spanish1503—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following14831397

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query14921404

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text14861405
LMArena Creative Writing14901388
LMArena Multi-Turn14891422
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper