Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GLM-4.7

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7 costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and GLM-4.7 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 24.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 58% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 6% for GLM-4.7.
  • GLM-4.7 is cheaper at $0.60 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-4.7 specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index59.842.0
Released2026-08-132025-12-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.60
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$2.20
Results tracked4436

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
LMArena WebDev15921435
SciCode59.8%45.1%
LMArena Coding14971454
ALE-Bench904.3399.48
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
FrontierSWE20.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
Terminal-Bench—33.4%
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—
Vending-Bench 2—2,377

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
CritPt14.3%1.7%
Chess Puzzles47%6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941443
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27143.51
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
SimpleBench—47.7%
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%83.3%
ProofBench58%6%
LMArena Math15071423
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—2.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
GPQA Diamond94.8%83.3%
SimpleQA Verified69.2%32.2%
LMArena Expert15081424
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), GLM-4.7: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
LMArena Non-English14841417
LMArena Chinese15481495
LMArena French15051432
LMArena German14981424
LMArena Japanese15121439
LMArena Korean14831399
LMArena Russian15161423
LMArena Spanish15031434

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
LMArena Instruction Following14831411

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
LMArena Longer Query14921432
CL-bench—15.9%
CL-bench Life—10.9%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGLM-4.7
LMArena Text14861435
LMArena Creative Writing14901401
EQ-Bench Creative Writing17231413
LMArena Multi-Turn14891446

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GLM-4.7?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7 costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and GLM-4.7 share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper