Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen-14B

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #33 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 68.2 to 27.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.131.4
Released2026-07-212023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 50.0 (#48), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14911071
DeepSWE46.7%—
FrontierCode34.4%—
LMArena WebDev1538—
SciCode52.7%—
WeirdML56.1%—
ALE-Bench715.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.3 (#65), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
APEX-Agents46.9%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.8 (#22), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14851027
Epoch Capabilities Index154.25113.03
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)89%—
ARC-AGI-191.2%—
CritPt10.6%—
Chess Puzzles43%—
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench95.5%—
LMCA44.9%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.3 (#40), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Math15051068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)58.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions70.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.2%—
ProofBench36%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#8), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond94.1%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1488—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.5 (#64), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1298—
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly23.3%—
LMArena Document1456—

Multilingual Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.5 (#19), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English14691041
LMArena Chinese15311077
LMArena French1504—
LMArena German1478—
LMArena Japanese1476—
LMArena Korean1431—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1475—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.0 (#33), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14661031

Long Context Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#50), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14741028

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.2 (#27), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashQwen-14B
LMArena Text14791051
LMArena Creative Writing14651028
LMArena Multi-Turn14811022
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1604—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Qwen-14B?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper