Model comparison
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 49.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 67.8 to 52.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleQA Verified: 66.2% for Gemini 3.6 Flash and 57.8% for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.75 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 49.6 (#45), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 46.7% | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1536 | 1542 |
| SciCode | 52.7% | 58.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1497 |
| FrontierCode | 34.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 56.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 715.52 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.4 (#56), Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 14% | 15% |
| APEX-Agents | 46.9% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.9 (#20), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89% | 84.9% |
| CritPt | 10.6% | 15.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1486 |
| DTBench | 95.5% | 94.4% |
| LMCA | 44.9% | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.36 | 154.32 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 91.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 43% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
Math Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.0 (#33), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 36% | 39% |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1477 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 58.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 70.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#7), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1489 | 1480 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.1% | — |
Multimodal Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.7 (#55), Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1297 | 1292 |
| LMArena Document | 1456 | 1465 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 31.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 23.3% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.8 (#17), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1470 | 1471 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | 1501 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 1478 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1477 | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | 1459 |
| LMArena Russian | 1490 | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1477 | 1471 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.2 (#27), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1457 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#47), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.3 (#26), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1478 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1464 | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1604 | 1927 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1484 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 49.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 49.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.