Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.6 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #33 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 58.8 to 28.9.

Side by side

Gemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index54.143.1
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked469

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 50.0 (#48), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding14911418
DeepSWE46.7%—
FrontierCode34.4%—
LMArena WebDev1538—
SciCode52.7%—
WeirdML56.1%—
ALE-Bench715.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.3 (#65), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
APEX-Agents46.9%—
GDP.pdf14%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.8 (#22), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14851416
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)89%—
ARC-AGI-191.2%—
CritPt10.6%—
Chess Puzzles43%—
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
DTBench95.5%—
LMCA44.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.25—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.3 (#40), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)58.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions70.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.2%—
ProofBench36%—
LMArena Math1505—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#8), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
GPQA Diamond94.1%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1488—

Multimodal Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.5 (#64), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision12981180
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly23.3%—
LMArena Document1456—

Multilingual Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.5 (#19), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English14691382
LMArena Chinese1531—
LMArena French1504—
LMArena German1478—
LMArena Japanese1476—
LMArena Korean1431—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1475—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.0 (#33), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following14661397

Long Context Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#50), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query14741404

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.6 Flash leads

Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.2 (#27), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

BenchmarkGemini 3.6 FlashHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text14791405
LMArena Creative Writing14651388
LMArena Multi-Turn14811422
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1604—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper