Model comparison
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 45.1 on the Noometry Index. GPT-6 Luna costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.6 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and GPT-6 Luna in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 67.8 to 40.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Furniture Assembly: 23.3% for Gemini 3.6 Flash and 44.2% for GPT-6 Luna.
- GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.6 Flash.
- GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 54.1 | 45.1 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.75 | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 46 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 49.6 (#45), GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 46.7% | 66.6% |
| FrontierCode | 34.4% | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1536 | 1583 |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1448 |
| SciCode | 52.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 56.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 715.52 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 32.4 (#56), GPT-6 Luna: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 46.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 58.9 (#20), GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89% | 68.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1486 | 1415 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 91.2% | — |
| CritPt | 10.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 43% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
| DTBench | 95.5% | — |
| LMCA | 44.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.36 | — |
Math Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 57.0 (#33), GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 58.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 22% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 70.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 94.2% | — |
| ProofBench | 36% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 67.8 (#7), GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1489 | 1458 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
Multimodal GPT-6 Luna leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 38.7 (#55), GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 23.3% | 44.2% |
| LMArena Vision | 1297 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 31.2% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1456 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 56.8 (#17), GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1470 | 1390 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1490 | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1477 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | 1501 | — |
| LMArena German | 1478 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1477 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1435 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 77.2 (#27), GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1414 |
Long Context Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 45.1 (#47), GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1475 | 1417 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.6 Flash leads
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 68.3 (#26), GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.6 Flash | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1478 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1464 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1400 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1604 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash better than GPT-6 Luna?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 45.1 on the Noometry Index. GPT-6 Luna costs 7.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.6 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.6 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash or GPT-6 Luna better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 49.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-6 Luna share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.6 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Luna has 18.