Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

WizardLM-2 8x22B Microsoft

31.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and WizardLM-2 8x22B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 66.3 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 92.8% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 43.4% for WizardLM-2 8x22B.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper at $0.62 / $0.62 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 66K.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index54.231.4
Released2026-05-192024-04-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M66K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$0.62
Output $ / M tokens$9$0.62
Results tracked542

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
LMArena Coding1492—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 28.9

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench31%—
LMArena Math1504—
MATH Level 5—25.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 23.3

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
GPQA Diamond92.8%43.4%
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1495—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Non-English1476—
LMArena Chinese1526—
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1492—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Russian1493—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following1467—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query1482—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1470—
EQ-Bench 41087—
LMArena Multi-Turn1481—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than WizardLM-2 8x22B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or WizardLM-2 8x22B?

WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.62 per million input tokens and $0.62 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and WizardLM-2 8x22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and WizardLM-2 8x22B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper