Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Step 3

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Step 3 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 28.4.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash and Step 3 specifications
Gemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
ProviderGoogleStepFun
Noometry Index54.240.5
Released2026-05-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked5417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Coding14921367
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14881355
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Expert14951333
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—

Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Vision13101177
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Non-English14761327
LMArena Chinese15261397
LMArena German14921371
LMArena Korean14511269
LMArena Russian14931331
LMArena Spanish14801371
LMArena French1490—
LMArena Japanese1486—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following14671332

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Longer Query14821326

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashStep 3
LMArena Text14821350
LMArena Creative Writing14701321
LMArena Multi-Turn14811341
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Step 3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Step 3 better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper