Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Ring-2.6-1T Ant Group (inclusionAI)

36.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 26.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 53.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 42.4% for Ring-2.6-1T.
  • Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
ProviderGoogleAnt Group (inclusionAI)
Noometry Index54.236.9
Released2026-05-192026-05-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked543

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
SciCode53.1%42.4%
ALE-Bench911.02432.57
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
WeirdML62.6%—
LMArena Coding1492—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
CritPt13.1%3.7%
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46—
ForecastBench59—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench31%—
LMArena Math1504—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1495—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Non-English1476—
LMArena Chinese1526—
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1492—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Russian1493—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Instruction Following1467—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Longer Query1482—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1470—
EQ-Bench 41087—
LMArena Multi-Turn1481—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper