Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 33 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 49.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 50% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 19% for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $1.50 / $9 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.251.5
Released2026-05-192026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$9$7.50
Results tracked5433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified79.3%77.3%
LMArena WebDev14991515
SciCode53.1%48.8%
LMArena Coding14921498
ALE-Bench911.021,189
DeepSWE37.4%—
WeirdML62.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval6.7%0.4%
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench76.7%70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%85.1%
CritPt13.1%13.4%
Chess Puzzles50%19%
EBR-Bench4.8%9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts14881483
Mystery Game Puzzles32%32%
DTBench94.7%92.3%
LMCA47.1%44%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46153.68
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
ForecastBench59—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%95.6%
ProofBench31%26%
LMArena Math15041490
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond92.8%90.9%
SimpleQA Verified66.2%55.8%
LMArena Expert14951488

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Qwen3.7 Max: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14761474
LMArena Chinese15261530
LMArena Russian14931484
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1492—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14671460

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14821482

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14821476
LMArena Creative Writing14701449
EQ-Bench 410871110
LMArena Multi-Turn14811481

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 51.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $9 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (49.4 vs 50.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max share?

33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper