Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3 32B

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.2

Rank #172 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3 32B in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 20.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 50% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 5% for Qwen3 32B.
  • Qwen3 32B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.239.2
Released2026-05-192025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$9$2.80
Results tracked5426

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
SciCode53.1%35.4%
LMArena Coding14921358
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
Aider Polyglot—40%
LMArena WebDev1499—
WeirdML62.6%—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 32B leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
APEX-Agents27.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
CritPt13.1%0.3%
Chess Puzzles50%5%
LMArena Hard Prompts14881334
DTBench94.7%67.5%
LMCA47.1%17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46138.51
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%66.9%
LMArena Math15041399
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
ProofBench31%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
GPQA Diamond92.8%65.7%
LMArena Expert14951362
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Qwen3 32B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English14761317
LMArena Chinese15261357
LMArena German14921341
LMArena Russian14931311
LMArena French1490—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Korean1451—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following14671305

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Longer Query14821327
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen3 32B
LMArena Text14821340
LMArena Creative Writing14701297
LMArena Multi-Turn14811331
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen3 32B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3 32B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper