Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Pixtral Large
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 21.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is EnigmaEval: 25.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 0.8% for Pixtral Large.
- Pixtral Large is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $9 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $9 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | 0.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | 1089 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | — |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Pixtral Large?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash lists at $1.50 and $9.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Pixtral Large share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.