Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Phi-1.5

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#29); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #29 Confirmed

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Phi-1.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash and Phi-1.5 specifications
Gemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index54.1—
Released2026-05-192023-09-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked547

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46), Phi-1.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
LMArena Coding1492—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107), Phi-1.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16), Phi-1.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
Epoch Capabilities Index154.5590.82
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1488—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
ForecastBench59—
HellaSwag—47.6%
WinoGrande—73.4%

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30), Phi-1.5: —

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10), Phi-1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1493—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—44.4%
BoolQ—75.8%
MMLU—37.6%
OpenBookQA—37.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13), Phi-1.5: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
LMArena Vision1311—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12), Phi-1.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
LMArena Non-English1475—
LMArena Chinese1525—
LMArena French1490—
LMArena German1500—
LMArena Japanese1481—
LMArena Korean1453—
LMArena Russian1491—
LMArena Spanish1478—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29), Phi-1.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39), Phi-1.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
LMArena Longer Query1481—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46), Phi-1.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashPhi-1.5
LMArena Text1481—
LMArena Creative Writing1467—
EQ-Bench 41087—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Phi-1.5?

Gemini 3.5 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#29); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Phi-1.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper