Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 66.3 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $9 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | — |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.