Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.2

Rank #32 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 19.1.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemma 1.1 2b IT specifications
Gemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index54.229.3
Released2026-05-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked5416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Coding14921034
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
ALE-Bench911.02—
HumanEval+—17.7%
MBPP+—23.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14881005
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.46—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Expert1495970
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Vision1310—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Non-English1476988
LMArena Chinese15261012
LMArena German1492944
LMArena Korean1451899
LMArena Russian1493990
LMArena French1490—
LMArena Japanese1486—
LMArena Spanish1480—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following1467992

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query14821003

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashGemma 1.1 2b IT
LMArena Text14821022
LMArena Creative Writing1470998
LMArena Multi-Turn1481959
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper