Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 38.3 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 144.64 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.