Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen1.5-110B

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.8

Rank #113 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.4 to 38.1.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.833.6
Released2026-07-212024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked3820

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding14551184
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts14411168
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.12—
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Qwen1.5-110B leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math14311185
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert14301144
GPQA Diamond83.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1266—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English14281142
LMArena Chinese14671206
LMArena French14521150
LMArena German14541123
LMArena Japanese14281074
LMArena Korean14061044
LMArena Russian14431118
LMArena Spanish14401141

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following14201158

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query14351157

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text14361175
LMArena Creative Writing14191148
LMArena Multi-Turn14451160
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper