Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiniMax-M3
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 32 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 32 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 5 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M3 leads 40.0 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Mystery Game Puzzles: 19% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 8% for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1482 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 47.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 640.02 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 65.1% |
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1447 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 8% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 78.9% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 33.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 146.95 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | 13% | 18% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1429 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1461 |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1432 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1433 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiniMax-M3?
MiniMax-M3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.4 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiniMax-M3 share?
32 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.