Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.8

Rank #113 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.4 to 46.7.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index41.837.0
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked3813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14551307
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14411257
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.12—

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14311269
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14301250
GPQA Diamond83.3%—

Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision12661180

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14281236
LMArena Chinese14671289
LMArena Russian14431243
LMArena French1452—
LMArena German1454—
LMArena Japanese1428—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14201250

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14351279

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14361263
LMArena Creative Writing14191250
LMArena Multi-Turn14451253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper