Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 3 27B
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 8.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 10 categories and Gemma 3 27B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 25.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 22.5% for Gemma 3 27B.
- Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2025-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.16 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 21.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1322 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 4.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 39.9% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1340 |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 52.5% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 12.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 130.04 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 51.5% |
| LiveBench | — | 50% |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 22.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1312 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 55.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 74% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 47.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1304 |
| Confabulations | — | 40.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1164 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1346 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1368 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1349 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1321 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 74.9% |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1333 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 33.3% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1346 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1266 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1345 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 79.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Gemma 3 27B?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 8.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Gemma 3 27B?
Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Gemma 3 27B better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Gemma 3 27B share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.