Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Solar Pro4

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 8.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #23 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 28.5.
  • Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 524K.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Solar Pro4 specifications
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
ProviderGoogleUpstage
Noometry Index56.742.1
Released2026-02-192026-08-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M524K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$12$1.20
Results tracked7118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena WebDev14471371
LMArena Coding14841437
SWE-bench Verified75.6%—
DeepSWE11.7%—
SciCode58.9%—
GSO22.6%—
WeirdML72.1%—
MirrorCode8.9%—
ALE-Bench1,161—
AlgoTune2.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Solar Pro4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents35.3%—
τ²-bench Banking26%—
DeepResearch Bench47.8%—
PostTrainBench22%—
BALROG57%—
ExploitBench26.1%—
GBAEval0.8%—
GDP.pdf17%—
LMArena Search1211—
METR Time Horizons77%—
Vending-Bench 23,774—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts14851399
ARC-AGI-277.1%—
SimpleBench79.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198%—
CritPt17.7%—
Chess Puzzles55%—
EnigmaEval36.8%—
Thematic Generalization79.4%—
EBR-Bench14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.1%—
LMCA53.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.77—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Math14851416
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)59.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions86.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench26%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)36.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)16.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert14851427
GPQA Diamond94.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam46.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Solar Pro4: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Vision1296—
Blueprint-Bench 226.5%—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English14771361
LMArena Chinese15291415
LMArena French14871397
LMArena German14911364
LMArena Japanese14931309
LMArena Korean14551382
LMArena Russian14981360
LMArena Spanish14791401

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following14661377

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query14831381
CL-bench20.8%—
CL-bench Life16.9%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewSolar Pro4
LMArena Text14811386
LMArena Creative Writing14821316
LMArena Multi-Turn14881385
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
EQ-Bench 41142—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Solar Pro4?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 8.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Solar Pro4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper