Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | 1483 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1491 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | 1467 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1477 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1480 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.7 vs 43.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.