Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 25.9.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1314 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1298 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1491 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1275 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1292 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.