Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 3 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 17.7% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 0% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 58.9% | 42.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 17% | 2% |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 17.7% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1485 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | — |
| LMArena French | 1487 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.