Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer 30B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer 30B leads 69.9 to 66.3.
- Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 55.2 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 71 | 1 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1485 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17), Muse Glimmer 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer 30B leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36), Muse Glimmer 30B: 69.9
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | 1798 |
| LMArena Text | 1480 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Muse Glimmer 30B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); Muse Glimmer 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Glimmer 30B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer 30B has 1.