Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Granite 4.1 30B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 4.1 30B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 21.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 58.9% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B.
- Granite 4.1 30B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2026-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88), Granite 4.1 30B: 34.6
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 58.9% | 25.8% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9), Granite 4.1 30B: 21.7
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 17.7% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1485 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36), Granite 4.1 30B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Granite 4.1 30B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1480 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Granite 4.1 30B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Granite 4.1 30B better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Granite 4.1 30B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 30B has 2.