Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemma 7B
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 19.9.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1048 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1042 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | 111.99 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1066 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | 1001 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1487 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1017 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1022 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | 963 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Gemma 7B?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemma 7B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.