Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1268 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1447 | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1485 | 1284 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.77 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1485 | 1251 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1485 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1477 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1487 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1491 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1493 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1455 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1498 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1479 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1466 | 1255 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1276 |
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1481 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1488 | 1276 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.