Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Ring-2.6-1T

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#144); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 26.1 to 22.9.
  • Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Ring-2.6-1T specifications
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
ProviderGoogleAnt Group (inclusionAI)
Noometry Index40.836.9
Released2026-03-032026-05-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked383

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
SciCode41.9%42.4%
ALE-Bench797.73432.57
LMArena WebDev1256—
WeirdML52.2%—
LMArena Coding1400—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
CritPt1.1%3.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1407—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
LMArena Math1428—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
LMArena Expert1398—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Non-English1411—
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1424—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1413—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1420—
LMArena Spanish1421—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Instruction Following1377—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Longer Query1394—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Ring-2.6-1T: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Text1416—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
LMArena Multi-Turn1417—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#144); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper