Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 8B
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 8B in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 22.9 to 16.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 35% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 8.8% for Qwen3 8B.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.9% | 22.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | 5% |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 59.7% |
| LMCA | 35% | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | 136.17 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 56.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | 4.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena French | 1424 | — |
| LMArena German | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | — |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Qwen3 8B?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen3 8B?
Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Qwen3 8B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.