Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Phi-2

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#141); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.4

Rank #141 Confirmed

Phi-2 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Phi-2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Phi-2 specifications
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.4—
Released2026-03-032023-12-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3811

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179), Phi-2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
LMArena Coding1400—
ALE-Bench797.73—
HumanEval+—45.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72), Phi-2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181), Phi-2: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
Epoch Capabilities Index144.45107.62
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1407—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Adversarial NLI—42.5%
BIG-Bench Hard—59.4%
ForecastBench54.4—
HellaSwag—53.6%
WinoGrande—54.7%

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82), Phi-2: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95), Phi-2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
LMArena Expert1397—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.9%
MMLU—58.4%
OpenBookQA—73.6%
TriviaQA—45.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57), Phi-2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82), Phi-2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
LMArena Non-English1410—
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1423—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1411—
LMArena Korean1393—
LMArena Russian1420—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126), Phi-2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
LMArena Instruction Following1376—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117), Phi-2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
LMArena Longer Query1394—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90), Phi-2: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePhi-2
LMArena Text1416—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
LMArena Multi-Turn1417—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Phi-2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has enough public results to be ranked (#141); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Phi-2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper