Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Nemotron 3 Super
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Super score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.4 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 61.0 to 56.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 52.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 38% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 40.4 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.9% | 36% |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | 38% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1403 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 213.9 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | 15.4% |
| CritPt | 1.1% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1386 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.45 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1381 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1397 | 1397 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57), Nemotron 3 Super: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1356 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1423 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1393 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1376 | 1347 |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1362 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90), Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1369 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Super score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.4 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Nemotron 3 Super share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.