Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Mistral Large
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 9 categories and Mistral Large in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 40.7 to 18.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 80% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 8.5% for Mistral Large.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Mistral Large.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Mistral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.9% | 36.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1277 |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | 264.7 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 30% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 62.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 59.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 38.4% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1257 |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 65.1% |
| LMCA | 35% | 16.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | 128.52 |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | 57.1 |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 50.1% |
| LiveBench | — | 48.4% |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 8.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1262 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 28.1% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 50.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 51.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | 4.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1232 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 59.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 21.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 43.5% |
| MMLU | — | 80% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Mistral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1237 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1325 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1188 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1202 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1257 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1268 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1249 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 67.9% |
| IFEval | — | 87.7% |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1261 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1266 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1243 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1260 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 69% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 985 |
| WildBench | — | 80.1% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 39.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Mistral Large?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Mistral Large?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Large lists at $2 and $6.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Mistral Large better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Mistral Large share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.