Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Mercury

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Mercury in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 46.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 67.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 21.6% for Mercury.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Mercury specifications
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
ProviderGoogleInception
Noometry Index40.837.6
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked389

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
LMArena Coding14001322
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Mercury: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%21.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14071285
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
LMArena Math1428—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
LMArena Expert1398—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
LMArena Non-English14111260
LMArena Chinese1461—
LMArena French1424—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1413—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1420—
LMArena Spanish1421—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
LMArena Instruction Following13771239

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
LMArena Longer Query13941266

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMercury
LMArena Text14161282
LMArena Creative Writing14011191
LMArena Multi-Turn14171282

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Mercury?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Mercury better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 38.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Mercury share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper