Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-4 Turbo

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 9 categories and GPT-4 Turbo in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 40.7 to 9.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 80% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 6.7% for GPT-4 Turbo.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-4 Turbo specifications
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index40.830.5
Released2026-03-032023-11-06
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M128K
Max output66K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$10
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$30
Results tracked3836

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
WeirdML52.2%18%
LMArena Coding14001268
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—48.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—58.2%
ALE-Bench797.73—
HumanEval+—86.6%
MBPP+—73.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), GPT-4 Turbo: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—
METR Time Horizons—36.7%

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
Chess Puzzles25%6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14071251
DTBench76.8%61.6%
LMCA35%9.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47127.25
ForecastBench54.459.4
SimpleBench—25.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%0.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%6.7%
LMArena Math14281272
MATH Level 5—46.7%

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
GPQA Diamond81.8%46.6%
LMArena Expert13981223
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Confabulations—28.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
MMLU—81.3%

Multimodal Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Vision12401090

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Non-English14111245
LMArena Chinese14611242
LMArena French14241276
LMArena German14291259
LMArena Japanese14131194
LMArena Korean13921187
LMArena Russian14201259
LMArena Spanish14211260

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following13771249

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Longer Query13941254

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Text14161272
LMArena Creative Writing14011269
LMArena Multi-Turn14171267

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GPT-4 Turbo?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-4 Turbo?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-4 Turbo better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-4 Turbo share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 Turbo has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper