Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 45.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1487 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1483 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1474 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1467 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1476 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1478 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.0 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.