Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 63.7 to 25.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 993 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1018 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1007 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.