Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Mistral 7B

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google

45.0

Rank #75 Confirmed

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 7.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 95.9% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 3.7% for Mistral 7B.
  • Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.
  • Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index45.023.0
Released2025-03-252023-09-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M8K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.25
Results tracked7837

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
LMArena Coding14521082
SWE-bench Verified57.6%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)53.6%—
Aider Polyglot83.1%—
LMArena WebDev1227—
SciCode42.8%—
GSO3.9%—
WeirdML54%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—19.5%
LiveBench Coding85.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete—27.3%
CadEval64%—
ALE-Bench785.52—
AlgoTune1.51—
HumanEval+—36%
MBPP+—42.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Mistral 7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
Terminal-Bench32.6%—
GDPval23.3%—
Remote Labor Index0.8%—
TheAgentCompany30.3%—
τ²-bench Banking13.7%—
DeepResearch Bench42.8%—
BALROG43.3%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons55.4%—
Vending-Bench 2573.64—

Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
Chess Puzzles20%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14551067
DTBench82.4%42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index145.32112.21
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench62.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark70.3%—
ARC-AGI-141%—
CritPt2%—
EnigmaEval5.6%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis79.9%—
LMCA34.8%—
Adversarial NLI—47.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—56.1%
ForecastBench61.3—
HellaSwag—81%
LiveBench82.3%—
PIQA—83%
WinoGrande—75.3%

Math Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.7%0.3%
LMArena Math14501085
MATH Level 595.9%3.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)24.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
Omni-MATH41.6%—
LiveBench Math90.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)14.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
GPQA Diamond85.3%15.2%
LMArena Expert14521036
Humanity's Last Exam21.6%—
MMLU-Pro86.3%—
Confabulations10.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7%—
GPQA (HELM)74.9%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.6%
BoolQ—87.4%
MMLU—62.5%
OpenBookQA—79.8%
TriviaQA—75.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Mistral 7B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
LMArena Vision1263—
GeoBench86%—
VPCT48%—
LMArena Document1421—
SpatialViz-Bench44.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
LMArena Non-English14511012
LMArena Chinese15071009
LMArena French14721037
LMArena German1487987
LMArena Japanese1461878
LMArena Russian14611018
LMArena Spanish14731026
LMArena Korean1434—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following14371060
LiveBench Instruction Following80.6%—
IFEval84%—

Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query14491060
Fiction.LiveBench91.7%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads

Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProMistral 7B
LMArena Text14581090
LMArena Creative Writing14541068
LMArena Multi-Turn14531062
Short-Story Creative Writing83.8%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1421—
WildBench85.7%—
LiveBench Language67.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Mistral 7B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 2.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Mistral 7B?

Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Pro lists at $1.25 and $10.

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 2.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Mistral 7B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper