Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3-70B
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 84.7% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 4.3% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1206 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 5% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | 35.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1195 |
| DTBench | 82.4% | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | 57.1 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | 22.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1149 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Llama 3-70B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1241 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1194 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1174 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1223 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Llama 3-70B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Llama 3-70B share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.