Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.8 to 39.5.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1312 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10% |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1316 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1360 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1282 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1284 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1308 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1299 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1314 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1317 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.