Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 34.4.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1308 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1257 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1268 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1252 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | 1180 |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1280 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1254 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.