Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini Advanced 0514
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini Advanced 0514 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 33.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1255 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Gemini Advanced 0514: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1248 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1272 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1215 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Gemini Advanced 0514: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1274 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1307 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1275 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1242 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1242 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1253 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1253 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemini Advanced 0514 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1269 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Gemini Advanced 0514?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini Advanced 0514 better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini Advanced 0514 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17.