Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 26.7 to 18.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 40.6 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.5 (#210), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1361 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.6 (#67), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.2 (#271), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1374 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.04 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 38.1 (#87), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.1 (#162), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1338 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.2 (#31), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.5 (#83), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1419 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | 1338 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.9 (#50), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1344 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#16), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1365 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 54.0 (#153), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1358 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1387 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.