Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Yi-1.5-34B

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

36.4

Rank #208 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 57.0 to 37.6.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index36.430.2
Released2025-06-172024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding13731169
WeirdML35.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13771160
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.93—

Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math13731182
Omni-MATH48%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Expert13731144
GPQA Diamond—32%
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English13691121
LMArena Chinese14041213
LMArena French13881155
LMArena German13901111
LMArena Japanese13591021
LMArena Korean13581005
LMArena Russian13731091
LMArena Spanish13961120

Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13661139
IFEval81%—

Long Context Yi-1.5-34B leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query13731144
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text13791173
LMArena Creative Writing13661135
LMArena Multi-Turn13671153
WildBench81.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Yi-1.5-34B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper