Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Wizardlm 70b

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

37.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.033.0
Released2025-06-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding13731081
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13771079
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94—

Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13731116
Omni-MATH48%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—
LMArena Expert1373—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13691078
LMArena Chinese14041052
LMArena German13891083
LMArena Russian13731155
LMArena French1388—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13671093
IFEval81%—

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13731097
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13791120
LMArena Creative Writing13671149
LMArena Multi-Turn13661108
WildBench81.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Wizardlm 70b?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper