Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Wizardlm 13b

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

37.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.031.4
Released2025-06-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding13731035
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts13771018
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94—

Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math13731017
Omni-MATH48%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—
LMArena Expert1373—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13691034
LMArena Chinese14041023
LMArena French1388—
LMArena German1389—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Russian1373—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13671048
IFEval81%—

Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13731054
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13791077
LMArena Creative Writing13671091
LMArena Multi-Turn13661047
WildBench81.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper